data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609c7/609c7e9eb859b032d31b1ebc8d436b34426b8eda" alt="Occupant packaging in car body design"
Location of 5th Percentile Adult Female Dummy Response to Comments on Maximum Test Speed Agency Decision to Establish Maximum Speed at 40 km/h (25 mph) Improving the Protection of Unbelted Occupants in Serious Crashes Minimizing the Risk of Injuries and Deaths Caused by Air Bags.Improving the Protection of Belted Occupants in Serious Crashes.Improving the Protection of Unbelted Occupants in Serious Crashes.Public Comments on the Supplemental Proposal Our Supplemental Proposal (November 1999) Monitoring of Implementation and Field Experience Research and Technology Assessment Selection of 40 km/h (25 mph) as Top Speed for Unbelted Rigid Barrier Test.Replacing the Unbelted Sled Test With the Unbelted Rigid Barrier Crash Test.Rationales for Protection Improvement Requirements.Rationales for Risk Minimization Requirements.Provision Implemented During Second Stage Phase-in.Protection Improvement Provisions Implemented During First Stage Phase-in.Risk Minimization Provisions Implemented During First Stage Phase-in.Changes to Our Initial Proposals in Response to Information and Comments.The Gathering of Information and Soliciting of Comments for This Rulemaking To Reduce Air Bag Risks Further.Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century.Contribution of Behavioral Changes and the Current, Redesigned Air Bags to Reducing Air Bag Risks.1996 Comprehensive Plan for Addressing Air Bag Risks.Early Agency Efforts to Reduce Air Bag Risks.The Rule, Its Rationale, and Its Implementation Preventing or Mitigating the Effects of the Second Collision Using Seat Belts and Air Bags Frontal Crashes and the “Second Collision”-The Leading Cause of Occupant Deaths This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links Headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
#Occupant packaging in car body design pdf
The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with While every effort has been made to ensure that Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609c7/609c7e9eb859b032d31b1ebc8d436b34426b8eda" alt="Occupant packaging in car body design"